You also need to understand the many ways you can fail. Unlock your access before this series is gone for good! Find Similar Topics. Show Tags. Own Kudos [? Guide to Perfect 6. I did put a lot of time in it the first time Being a non-native speaker and having not written a damn essay of any kind in many many years, I was very scared of the AWA. So, I went through every guide that I could find and wrote nearly essays.
Even had a friend grade them for me Pathetic, huh? Anyway, for my second time, I just looked over my templates I created and wrote one of each the day before test just to refresh my memory on faster typing without making too many typos So, here it is Enjoy, and please do not blame me if the 6.
General Structure Intro - Restate argument, point out flaws or state intention to discuss them below 1st Para - First, Templates Intro: The argument claims that This statement is a stretch For example, The argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly stated that This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between To illustrate, In fact, it is not at all clear If the argument had provided evidence that Without convincing answers to these questions, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts In this particular case Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.
This electronic game rating system is not working because it is self regulated and the fines for violating the rating system are nominal. As a result an independent body should oversee the game industry and companies that knowingly violate the rating system should be prohibited from releasing a game for two years. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion.
You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound. The argument claims that the electronic games rating system, although similar to the movie rating system, is not working because it is self regulated and violation fines are nominal, Hence, the gaming rating system should be overseen by an independent body.
Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion relies on assumptions, for which there is no clear evidence.
Therefore, the argument is rather weak, unconvincing, and has several flaws. First, the argument readily assumes that because the electronic game rating system is self regulated, it is not working well. This statement is a stretch and not substantiated in any way. There are numerous examples in other areas of business or commerce, where the entities are self regulated and rather successful.
For instance, FIA, the Formula1 racing organization is self regulated. Yet, the sport is very popular and successful, drawing millions of spectators around the world each year. Tickets are rather expensive, races are shown on pay-per-view, and nearly all drivers are paid very well.
Another example is the paralleled movie rating system that the argument mentions. The author fails to clarify whether it is working well, but it is clear that the movie rating system is pretty well received by people, who often base their decisions to go see a movie with kids or not on the movie rating.
It has never been a case when someone would feel cheated by the movie rating and express disappointment afterwards. Since the movie rating system is also self regulated, it follows that this regulatory method is working pretty well and it is not obvious how it can be the reason for the poor electronic game rating system. The argument would have been much clearer if it explicitly gave examples of how the self regulatory system led to bad ratings and customer dissatisfaction.
Second, the argument claims that any violation fees for bad electronic game ratings are nominal. It thus suggests that this is yet another reason for the rating system not working. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between the monetary amount of the fines and the quality of the electronic game rating system. In fact, the argument does not even draw a parallel with the mentioned movie rating system and its violation fines.
If any such correlation had been shown for the movie rating system, which supposedly works well, then the author would have sounded a bit more convincing. In addition, if the argument provided evidence that low violation fines lead to electronic game manufacturers to ignore any regulations with respect to the game rating system, the argument could have been strengthened even further.
Finally, the argument concludes that an independent body should oversee the game industry and companies that violate the rating system, should be punished.
From this statement again, it is not at all clear how an independent regulatory body can do a better job than a self regulated one. Without supporting evidence and examples from other businesses where independent regulatory bodies have done a great job, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence. As a result, this conclusion has no legs to stand on.
In summary, the argument is flawed and therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts. In order to assess the merits of a certain situation, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors.
Identify the key assumptions to further substantiate your writing and convey your ideas more effectively. Even for avid writers, strict time constraints can pose serious challenges when attempting this section. In this regard, it is absolutely necessary to work out a template and practice working upon it regularly. You should memorize this template and weave your essay around it. As a rule of thumb, the first paragraph should begin with introduction about the argument and its sources. You should summarize given argument and pin point the flaws that you notice in it.
Remember to write short sentences for summarizing arguments that you are presenting. It should have sentences. Your second paragraph should focus on the first flaw that you found in argument. Explain the reason behind its faulty logic and focus entirely upon this particular flaw without any distraction from the point. If you have pinpointed a fact or statistic, question the author about its source and context in brief. This paragraph should have sentences. Here too, lay your focus only on the flaw and explain your logical reasons in sentences.
In this paragraph, you can assert on your stance. Try to present another viewpoint for these assumptions focusing deeply on addressing the flaws.
This paragraph should also have sentences. Conclude the essay in this paragraph with brief summarization of flaws and your suggested alternatives for the same. It should be brief and concisely framed with sentences. The AWA is scored in such a way that it is possible to have a basic template in mind which can later be fleshed out with relevant details from the provided prompt. Having this prepared will help you not only write a convincing essay, but will also help you to focus the specific details you are pulling from the prompt.
We recommend that you plan your ideas in a brief outline during the 30 minutes provided. Memorizing your own version of the example template below will help you to organize your ideas and take some of the pressure off. Prepare for the AWA Essay. Find a flaw — familiarize yourself with common logical fallacies used in arguments to help you quickly identify places where the text asserts something without sufficient evidence.
Identify its underlying assumption — ask yourself, what assumptions is the author making given the details and evidence he or she has provided thusfar? You can even plan your transition words ahead of time, as I did in some of the examples above. Our proprietary GMAT Diagnostic Assessment creates a customized study plan for you that takes you from registration all the way to test day!
It is included with every account and proven to significantly maximize your score. So, in your essay, you might focus mostly on what else you would need to evaluate the argument—like all the different kinds of reasoning and evidence that the author would need to further support this conclusion. And you should be comfortable with your template and the plan-of-attack baked into it well before test day.
Practice using your template on a wide array of GMAT prompts, not just ones that deal with plans-of-actions for corporate, which are the most common. Writing more than six essays is likely overkill, but going through four to five practice essays on a variety of different topics will help you test out your GMAT writing template and ensure a top score on the real thing.
Jess Hendel is a Brooklyn-based academic advisor, test prep tutor, and content writer for PrepScholar. A graduate of Amherst College, she has several years of experience writing content and designing curricula for the top e-learning organizations. She is passionate about leveraging new media and technology to help students around the world achieve their potential.
View all posts by Jess Hendel. Get your personalized assessment as part of your 5 day risk-free trial now:. Was this helpful?
0コメント